MyRecon vs WhatsMyName

WhatsMyName was built in 2015 for the same reason we built our scoring: username checkers kept reporting accounts that did not exist. Of all the tools we compare against, this is the one whose philosophy is closest to ours.

Checked against WhatsMyName's own documentation on 25 September 2026

Short answer

For username coverage, WhatsMyName wins: 700+ sites, a web app, and detection rules that require both a positive and a negative signal. MyRecon wins when the investigation goes past the username, into email, breaches, domains, DNS and IPs, and when you want each match scored rather than matched against a rule. Both are free; using both is sensible.

MyRecon compared with WhatsMyName
FeatureMyReconWhatsMyName
What it isA multi-lookup OSINT toolA community dataset, plus the whatsmyname.app front end
Sites123 on the web, 560 in the Android app700+, per its README
How a hit is decidedScored evidence: status, content, metadata, redirectsPer-site rules: expected code and string for found, and for missing
Confidence label per matchYes, high / medium / lowNo, a rule matches or it does not
Shows what it rejected, and whyYesNo
Email, breach, domain, DNS, IPYesNo
ExportJSON, CSVCSV from the web app
Data licenceCode MITDataset CC BY-SA 4.0
Used inside other toolsNoYes, many OSINT tools consume the dataset

What WhatsMyName is

WhatsMyName is a community-maintained dataset of more than 700 websites, started in 2015 by Micah Hoffman (WebBreacher) specifically to deal with false positives in existing username checkers. Each site entry describes how to tell a real account from a missing one: an expected status code and a string that should appear when the account exists, and a separate code and string that indicate it does not. The data is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 and is used by a long list of other OSINT tools. The public front end at whatsmyname.app lets you run a search in the browser, filter by category and export to CSV.

Two answers to the same problem

The false-positive problem is simple to state. Many sites answer "200 OK" whether or not a profile exists, or show a login wall, or redirect every unknown name to the homepage. A checker that reads only the status code will report accounts that are not there.

WhatsMyName's answer is a stricter rule per site: a hit needs the right code and the right text, and the dataset also records what "missing" looks like. That is a real improvement over status-only detection, and it is why the dataset is so widely reused.

MyRecon's answer is to score rather than match. Status, page content, profile metadata such as an avatar or display name, and redirect behaviour are combined into a score, and the match is labelled high, medium or low. Anything that answered but did not clear the bar is listed in a "not confirmed" panel with its status code and the reason. The trade-off is honest: rules are transparent and easy to audit per site; scoring is more forgiving of small page changes and tells you how sure it is. Our Android app adds a third layer, requesting an impossible control handle on every platform so a site that answers both alike cannot produce a match.

Where WhatsMyName beats MyRecon

Where MyRecon beats WhatsMyName

Which one should you use?

For a pure username sweep with the widest reach, use WhatsMyName, and read its results with the same care you would give any checker. For an investigation that will move from a handle to an email, a domain or an IP, or when you want each match graded, use MyRecon. Accounts that show up in both are the ones to trust first.

Questions people ask

Does MyRecon use the WhatsMyName dataset?

No. MyRecon's platform list and scoring are maintained separately. WhatsMyName's data is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, and any tool that does use it is required to credit it.

Why do two username checkers give different results for the same handle?

They check different sites, decide existence with different rules, and send requests from different networks, some of which a platform may block. A result both tools agree on is much more likely to be real.

Which is better for checking my own footprint?

Either works for usernames. MyRecon also checks your email against breach data and your passwords with k-anonymity, which covers the other half of a personal footprint review.

Other comparisons

Run the test yourself

Search a handle you own, then one that cannot exist, like zq-no-such-user-8841. A tool worth trusting reports nothing for the second.

Open the username search Six tests for any tool